Sulzberger asked the board to consider two things. The New York Times runs an article today that begins: Duranty, a reporter for the New York Times and an apologist for Stalin, won his award in for work one later observer described as a "dull and largely uncritical recitation of Soviet sources"; he subsequently failed to write about the famine that Stalin's policies were unleashing in Ukraine.
Why blog on this today.
So long as it is not overtly political, however, as it sometimes but very rarely gets, I can focus on the dramatic aspect of Star Trek and appreciate it at the level of plot and character, not message. The journal entry describes a student, who is unnamed, having a dream while asleep in class.
I felt like writing Joe a check purely on the basis of the speech he gave at the Arab-American convention last week, though I didn't in the end.
Why is this so. These examples are adapted from: Sometimes, nominalizations can be useful: We hope that these overviews and exercises help you reduce word count, clarify your writing, and improve your papers. For the record, I had a gleeful little smirk when I first saw a Darwin fish, and continue to give such smirks at lots of the variants one sees from time to time.
In an attempt to prove that "logorrhea" accompanies a lack of academic rigor, physics professor Alan Sokal wrote a nonsensical essay, and had it published in a respected journal Social Text as a practical joke.
This plot device serves a number of purposes and changes the character of the series. That's why I didn't title the post "Amazon unveils new procrastination device. Yes, I'd probably prefer Lieberman to Dean on other grounds-- not least the foreign policy questions that are attracting some libertarians to the latter.
The Event of the Age: Her understanding of the situation was evidenced by the quitting of her job.
That's as it should be. Antiwar types can enjoy it as well however. But awards themselves are just gestures, and revocations are the best countergesture that can now be made. But the searches I've run so far seem to work smoothly; the engine returns Rawls' own books and those with his name in the title long before it returns, say, The Multiculturalism of Fear, which according to the search engine has six references to Rawls in it, two of which are in the titles of other people's works.
The Philosophy and Literature Bad Writing Contest ran from to For an essay giving background on the contest, click here. We are pleased to announce winners of the fourth Bad Writing Contest, sponsored by the scholarly journal Philosophy and Literature. The Bad Writing Contest celebrates the most stylistically lamentable passages found in scholarly books and articles.
The academic community can be conservative when it comes to writing styles, but your writing shouldn’t be so boring that people lose interest midway through the first paragraph! Nominalization in Scientific and Technical Writing "The forces which operate to encourage nominalization are understandable.
Dealing continually in concepts, scientific and technical writers tend to isolate activities such as 'experimenting,' 'measuring,' and 'analysing' as abstract conceptual units in their minds.
Apr 04, · Nominalization is abused by students seeking to inflate word counts and politicians trying to give their writing false objectivity, but in academic writing it serves a useful purpose as long as it.
When the nominalization is the subject of a passive voice structure: Identify the true subject, and convert nominalization to a verb for that subject.
The approval of the plan was given by the committee. One of the problems these passages illustrate is what some call nominalization.
William Zinsser, in his excellent book, On Writing Well, calls it “creeping nounism.” It is .Essay writing nominalization